submodular maximization
Improved Algorithms for Online Submodular Maximization via First-order Regret Bounds
We consider the problem of nonnegative submodular maximization in the online setting. At time step t, an algorithm selects a set St C 2V where C is a feasible family of sets. An adversary then reveals a submodular function ft. The goal is to design an efficient algorithm for minimizing the expected approximate regret. In this work, we give a general approach for improving regret bounds in online submodular maximization by exploiting "first-order" regret bounds for online linear optimization. For monotone submodular maximization subject to a matroid, we give an efficient algorithm which achieves a (1 c/e ฮต)-regret of O( p kTln(n/k)) where n is the size of the ground set, k is the rank of the matroid, ฮต > 0 is a constant, and cis the average curvature. Even without assuming any curvature (i.e., taking c = 1), this regret bound improves on previous results of Streeter et al. (2009) and Golovin et al. (2014). For nonmonotone, unconstrained submodular functions, we give an algorithm with 1/2-regret O( nT), improving on the results of Roughgarden and Wang (2018). Our approach is based on Blackwell approachability; in particular, we give a novel first-order regret bound for the Blackwell instances that arise in this setting.
Do Less, Get More: Streaming Submodular Maximization with Subsampling
In this paper, we develop the first one-pass streaming algorithm for submodular maximization that does not evaluate the entire stream even once. By carefully subsampling each element of the data stream, our algorithm enjoys the tightest approximation guarantees in various settings while having the smallest memory footprint and requiring the lowest number of function evaluations. More specifically, for a monotone submodular function and a $p$-matchoid constraint, our randomized algorithm achieves a $4p$ approximation ratio (in expectation) with $O(k)$ memory and $O(km/p)$ queries per element ($k$ is the size of the largest feasible solution and $m$ is the number of matroids used to define the constraint).